Skip to main content

Tate v. State

Citations

  • 933 A.2d 447
  • 176 Md. App. 365
  • 2007 Md. App. LEXIS 132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • articulating that, generally speaking, trial courts are afforded broad discretion in the conduct of trials and in determining the reception of evidence
  • articulating that, generally speaking, trial courts are afforded broad discretion in the conduct of trials and in determining the reception of evidence
  • argument about prosecutor’s improper comments not preserved for appellate review when “counsel neither objected when the argument was made nor at any later point [and] did not request a mistrial or a curative instruction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Rodowsky, Moylan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.