Skip to main content

Schmitt v. State

Citations

  • 210 Md. App. 488
  • 63 A.3d 638
  • 2013 WL 1157271
  • 2013 Md. App. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The video of appellant masturbating on the same memory card as the video of [the minor victim] dressing provides the jury with a basis to conclude that appellant’s action in taping [the minor victim] constituted exploitation of a sexual nature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Raker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.