Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/1/1982

Williams v. State

Citations

102 A.2d 714
204 Md. 55

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[ijn Maryland there has been no deviation from the rule that what takes place in the jury-room ought to be, as it generally is, known only to the jurors themselves and that their testimony cannot in general be heard to impeach their verdict” (citation omitted)
holding that “[i]n Maryland there has been no deviation from the rule that what takes place in the jury-room ought to be, as it generally is, known only to the jurors themselves and that their testimony cannot in general be heard to impeach their verdict” (citation omitted)
“[A] conviction on one count may stand even in the face of an inconsistent acquittal on another count.”
discussing reasons for not questioning jury verdicts
discussing reasons for not questioning jury verdicts
discussing reasons for not questioning jury verdicts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sobeloff, Delaplaine, Collins, Henderson, Hammond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.