Seventh Circuit· 4/8/2010
Tamburo v. Dworkin
Citations
- 601 F.3d 693
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7261
- 2010 WL 1387299
Judges: Bauer, Kanne, and Sykes, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
117 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court· 2021-03-25· cited 1,735×
- Advanced Tactical Ordnance Systems, LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2014-05-09· cited 374×
- Robert Felland v. Patrick CliftonSeventh Circuit· 2012-06-06· cited 364×
- Shrader v. BiddingerTenth Circuit· 2011-02-28· cited 347×
- uBID, Inc. v. GoDaddy Group, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2010-09-29· cited 317×
- Charles Curry v. Revolution Laboratories, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2020-02-10· cited 274×
- Mobile Anesthesiologists Chicago, LLC v. Anesthesia Associates of Houston Metroplex, P.A.Seventh Circuit· 2010-10-01· cited 269×
- Northern Grain Marketing, LLC v. Marvin GrevingSeventh Circuit· 2014-02-18· cited 262×
- Christopher Bilek v. Federal Insurance CompanySeventh Circuit· 2021-08-10· cited 259×
- William Kipp v. Ski Enterprise CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2015-04-15· cited 190×
- Illinois v. Hemi Group LLCSeventh Circuit· 2010-09-14· cited 171×
- Tai Matlin v. Spin Master Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2019-04-22· cited 165×
- Be2 LLC v. IvanovSeventh Circuit· 2011-04-27· cited 153×
- Sherwin Brook v. J. McCormleySeventh Circuit· 2017-10-11· cited 138×
- Laura Canaday v. The Anthem Companies, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2021-08-17· cited 128×
- In Re Text Messaging Antitrust LitigationSeventh Circuit· 2010-12-29· cited 123×
- Abdouch v. LopezNebraska Supreme Court· 2013-04-19· cited 118×
- Holocaust Victims of v. OTP BankSeventh Circuit· 2012-08-22· cited 115×
- Russell v. SNFAIllinois Supreme Court· 2013-05-24· cited 101×
- Waters v. Day & Zimmermann NPS, Inc.First Circuit· 2022-01-13· cited 56×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 3,198×
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ninth Circuit· 2004-06-30· cited 1,487×
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court· 1991-04-17· cited 1,405×
- O'CONNOR v. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., Ltd.Third Circuit· 2007-07-26· cited 825×
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-01-16· cited 780×
- Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo, Incorporated, and Stwb, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 2003-08-04· cited 723×
- Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2008-01-28· cited 651×
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nFirst Circuit· 1998-04-27· cited 625×
- Miller Yacht Sales, Inc. v. SmithThird Circuit· 2004-09-20· cited 608×
- Imo Industries, Inc. v. Kiekert AgThird Circuit· 1998-09-03· cited 594×
- Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellFirst Circuit· 1995-12-05· cited 587×
- Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'antisemitismeNinth Circuit· 2006-01-12· cited 490×
- Bancroft & Masters, Inc., a California Corporation v. Augusta National Inc., a Georgia CorporationNinth Circuit· 2000-08-18· cited 484×
- Darrell J. Bird v. Marshall Parsons, Stephen Vincent, George Decarlo, Dotster, Inc., and afternic.com, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2002-05-21· cited 471×
Other cases named Tamburo v. Dworkin
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.