William Kipp v. Ski Enterprise Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding any state other than the states of incorporation and principal place of business can assert general jurisdiction only by adhering to the “stringent criteria” of Daimler and Goodyear
• assuming that Illinois and federal standards for the exercise of personal jurisdiction are coextensive
• finding the fact that the defendant did not maintain an Illinois office or have employees in Illinois undermined the allegation that the court had general jurisdiction
• noting that general jurisdiction “should not lightly be found”
• noting that general jurisdiction “should not lightly be found”
• “Specific jurisdiction is case specific; the claim must be linked to the activities or contacts with the forum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).