Tenth Circuit· 2/28/2011

Shrader v. Biddinger

Citations

633 F.3d 1235
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3797
2011 WL 678386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that operating a website, on its own, does not “subject the owner or operator to personal jurisdiction” where the site is accessed
concluding no specific personal jurisdiction for defendant who merely posted information on website accessible everywhere
concluding there would have been specific personal jurisdiction for defendant who sent email if he had knowingly directed the email at someone in Oklahoma
explaining that courts take as true only “well-pled (that is, plausible . . . and non-speculative) facts”
observing that “in a sense, the internet operates ‘in’ every state regardless of where the user is physically located”
observing that “in a sense, the internet operates ‘in’ every state regardless of where the user is physically located”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holloway, Anderson, and Tacha, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.