Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo, Incorporated, and Stwb, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff's burden rises to preponderance of evidence if district court holds ev- identiary hearing
• noting that plaintiff's burden rises to preponderance of evidence if district court holds ev- identiary hearing
• explaining that plaintiffs must generally only make a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction
• explaining that plaintiffs must generally only make a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction
• noting that an agreement providing for the application of a state’s law and contemplating that a substantial portion of the defendant’s operations would take place in that state is strong evidence of sufficient minimum contacts
• “contracting with an out-of-state party alone cannot establish automatically sufficient minimum contacts in the other party’s home forum”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).