Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the proximate causation test was met where the defendant’s communication to eBay was “at the very core of [the] plaintiffs’ suit”
• holding the “express aiming” element asks about “the ‘focal point’ of [the defendant’s] purposive efforts”
• “As between the remaining but-for and proximate causation tests, we have no need to pick sides today.”
• recounting Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 789–90 (1984)
• discussing Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 789 (1984)
• declining to “pick” one test over the other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).