Skip to main content

Lane v. State

Citations

  • 864 S.E.2d 34
  • 312 Ga. 619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “in the absence of a timely objection, there is no appellate review of evidentiary rulings under the old Evidence Code” (cleaned up)
  • explaining that under the former Evidence Code, “in the absence of a timely objection, there is no appellate review of evidentiary rulings” (cleaned up)
  • noting that “we are not limited in our assessment of the objective reasonableness of lawyer performance to the subjective reasons offered by trial counsel for his conduct”
  • noting that “we are not limited in our assessment of the objective reasonableness of lawyer performance to the subjective reasons offered by trial counsel for his conduct”
  • noting that “we are not limited in our assessment of the objective reasonableness of lawyer performance to the subjective reasons offered by trial counsel for his conduct” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.