Skip to main content

Charleston v. State

Citations

  • 292 Ga. 678
  • 743 S.E.2d 1
  • 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 754
  • 2013 Ga. LEXIS 300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that participation in a crime may be inferred from association prior to, during, and after the crime
  • explaining that participation in a crime may be inferred from 5 association prior to, during, and after the crime
  • A defendant’s “assertion that his trial counsel failed to act as an advocate on several occasions does not meet this stringent standard.” (punctuation omitted)
  • even if defendant was not the shooter, conduct before, during, and after the shooting supported convictions as a party to the crimes
  • Cronic established a narrow exception to the general Strickland standard, which exception applies only when counsel’s failure to subject the State’s case to adversarial testing is complete and occurs throughout the proceeding, not merely at specific points
  • Cronic established a narrow exception to the general Strickland standard, which exception applies only when counsel's failure to subject the State's case to adversarial testing is complete and occurs throughout the proceeding, not merely at specific points

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.