Skip to main content

McClendon v. State

Citations

  • 299 Ga. 611
  • 791 S.E.2d 69

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[T]he question of whether hearsay evidence violates the Confrontation Clause turns ... on whether the hearsay statement is testimonial.\
  • “[T]he question of whether hearsay evidence violates the Confrontation Clause turns . . . on whether the hearsay statement is testimonial.”
  • “Because [appellant] raises an issue on appeal that was not presented or ruled upon by the trial court, his argument is not preserved for review by this Court.”
  • “Because [the defendant] raises an issue on appeal that was not presented [to] or ruled upon by the trial court, his argument is not preserved for review by this Court.”
  • trial counsel’s strategic decision not to seek mistrial not objectively 36 unreasonable when he believed that cross-examination of State’s key witness would be less effective on retrial
  • “Because [appellant] raise[d] an issue on appeal that was not presented or ruled upon by the trial court, his argument is not preserved for review by this Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.