Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/19/2014
Walker v. State
Citations
- 407 S.C. 400
- 756 S.E.2d 144
- 2014 WL 1052609
- 2014 S.C. LEXIS 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging an appellate court's great deference to a PCR court's findings on matters of credibility
- stating trial counsel has a duty to conduct a reasonable investigation or to make a reasonable decision that makes investigation unnecessary
- providing this court gives great deference to the PCR court’s determinations of credibility
- stating to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a PCR applicant must demonstrate (1) \counsel was deficient\ and (2) \the deficiency resulted in prejudice\ (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984))
- stating to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a PCR applicant must demonstrate (1) \counsel was deficient\ and (2) \the deficiency resulted in prejudice\ (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Hearn, Kittredge, Moore, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Putnam v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-06-08· cited 5×
- Earley v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-10-19· cited 2×
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-07-29· cited 2×
- Bagwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-08-27· cited 1×
- Weldon v. South CarolinaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-10-06
- Lucero v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-09-09
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-07-26· cited 1,327×
- Suber v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-01-22· cited 53×
- Glover v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-06-19· cited 42×
- William Grooms v. Herman Solem, Warden of the South Dakota State PenitentiaryEighth Circuit· 1991-01-08· cited 38×
- Franklin v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-27· cited 33×
- Lomax v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-07-28· cited 28×
- Simuel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-10-25· cited 19×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-02-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.