Skip to main content

Guillory v. State

Citations

  • 170 P.3d 403
  • 285 Kan. 223
  • 2007 Kan. LEXIS 696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding pro se litigants are not excused from requirement to be aware of and follow the rules of procedure, including filing a timely notice of appeal
  • holding Ortiz did not apply to appeal of K.S.A. 60-1507 motion untimely filed
  • Ortiz exceptions inapplicable to out-of-time appeal from summary denial of K.S.A. 60-1507 motion; no statutory right to appeal attached to this civil action
  • Pro se litigant cannot be given either advantage or disadvantage solely because of proceeding pro se.
  • Ortiz exceptions inapplicable to out-of-time appeal from summary denial of K.S.A. 60-1507 motion
  • \Failure to file a timely notice of appeal requires dismissal of the untimely appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, McAnany, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.