Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/20/1982

Rogers v. State

Citations

640 S.W.2d 248
1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the appellant could not complain about the procedures used to revoke his probation when he failed to make an objection in the trial court
concluding that because defendant “failed to voice any due process objection to the procedures used by the trial court,” he failed to preserve his complaint about probation-revocation proceedings
holding that procedural due process complaints are subject to waiver under ordinary preservation-of-error rules
holding that failure to make due process objection to punishment procedure waived complaint
holding, in second opinion on rehearing, that procedural due process complaints are subject to waiver under ordinary preservation-of-error rules
holding that, to properly preserve error, appellant should lodge an objection “either at the time the judge continues the hearing and/or probation, or at the time of actual revocation or at the time of sentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Odom, Onion, Davis, Clinton, McCormick, Dally, Roberts, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

188 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.