Skip to main content
· 1/15/1988

Stewart v. Brennan

Citations

  • 748 P.2d 816
  • 7 Haw. App. 136
  • 1988 Haw. App. LEXIS 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the course of dealing between the parties is a surrounding circumstance to be considered when a contract is ambiguous
  • in the course of holding that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial, noting that “there was substantial evidence presented at trial to support the verdict”
  • when the meaning of specific contractual terms is unclear, a court may consider extrinsic evidence, such as evidence of surrounding circumstances and the subsequent acts and conduct of the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Tanaka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.