Kometani v. Heath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that it was proper for the jury to consider the “reasonable value” of future medical expenses
• affirming that it was proper for the jury to consider the \reasonable value\ of future medical expenses
• stating that if a court's error does not affect the substantial rights of the parties, the error is harmless
• holding that preventing counsel from making an offer of proof out of hearing of jury during his attempt to rehabilitate witness was harmless error where “trial court’s action was not inconsistent with substantial justice and did not affect the substantial rights of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).