Benuska v. Dahl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[i]t is well established that the subject of drinking may not be raised or examined by a party unless that party can prove actual intoxication\
• “[a] mistrial should be declared only as a result of some occurrence of such character and magnitude that a party is deprived of its right to a fair trial.”
• \[i]t is well established that the subject of drinking may not be raised or examined by a party unless that party can prove actual intoxication\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).