Steven C. Willis v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a] majority of circuits that have addressed the question whether reckless disregard of the interests of the bank is sufficient to prove intent to defraud have answered in the affirmative”
• \Criminal intent . . . exists if a person acts knowingly and if the natural results of his conduct would be to injure or defraud the bank even though this may not have been his motive.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).