Skip to main content
· 6/1/2012

Kareem Jackson v. Margaret Bradshaw

Citations

  • 681 F.3d 753
  • 2012 WL 1958887
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying habeas relief where the petitioner contended that eyewitness identifications were “essential” to the prosecution’s case
  • “Courts generally entrust cross-examination techniques, like other matters of trial strategy, to the professional discretion of counsel.”
  • counsel did not perform deficiently by failing to press witness on her possible bias particularly when the effect of further probing was speculative
  • eyewitness identification “was not the entire basis of the prosecution's case against Petitioner”
  • no prejudice when post-conviction proceedings don’t turn up new expert findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Martin, Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.