United States v. Jay Ellsworth Krepps

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “those who are charged by law with the examination of these records have a significant interest in obtaining a full picture of the bank’s actual condition”
• entry may be false by virtue of omission of material information as much as by actual misstatement
• “[A] jury may plausibly have determined that Krepps intended to deceive . . . when he omitted from the bank records any reference to his being the beneficiary of the loan.”
• in which a bank officer was the sole defendant
• in which a bank officer was the sole defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).