D.C. Circuit· 1/31/2018
Stephens v. Farmers Rest. Grp.
Citations
- 291 F. Supp. 3d 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that conditional certification “would be unfair to Defendants, who have had no opportunity to test the sufficiency of these new allegations at the pleading stage’
- stating that \defendants cannot defeat conditional certification by pointing to immaterial variations in how the improper policies alleged by the plaintiff were applied\
- observing that courts are not required to address arguments \raised only cursorily in a footnote\ (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)
- observing that \pure speculation\ is not sufficient to establish a common policy or practice
- applying the three-year period in the conditional certification stage as Defendants failed to argue Plaintiff’s allegations were “implausible.”
- limiting class to employees who worked at restaurants in D.C. and Maryland when the plaintiffs failed to present evidence of a similar policy at Virginia locations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Meyer v. Panera Bread Co.D.C. Circuit· 2018-10-16· cited 19×
- Camara v. Mastro's Rests. LLCD.C. Circuit· 2018-10-24· cited 8×
- Harris v. Med. Transp. Mgmt., Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2018-07-17· cited 6×
- Meyer v. Panera Bread CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 2018-10-16
- Camara v. Mastros Restaurants LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2018-10-24
- Bradley v. Vox Media, Inc..District of Columbia· 2019-03-06
- Stephens v. Farmers Restaurant GroupDistrict of Columbia· 2019-06-20
- Parker v. McCormick & Schmick's SeafoodDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-08-29
- Hu v. K4 Solutions, IncDistrict of Columbia· 2020-03-12
- Guevara v. Spartan Enterprises, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2020-11-23
- Guzman v. Gf, Inc.District of Columbia· 2021-06-14
- Harrington v. Fb Hospitality, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2024-09-26
- Casey v. Parts Authority, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2025-05-14
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court· 1990-01-09· cited 1,715×
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court· 2013-04-16· cited 1,227×
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court· 2016-01-20· cited 967×
- Myers v. Hertz Corp.Second Circuit· 2010-10-27· cited 803×
- Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Second Circuit· 2013-03-01· cited 650×
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Eleventh Circuit· 1996-04-09· cited 329×
- Joanie Dybach v. State of Florida Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 1991-09-30· cited 293×
- Symczyk v. Genesis HealthCare Corp.Third Circuit· 2011-08-31· cited 159×
- Jose Gomez v. Campbell-Ewald Co.Ninth Circuit· 2014-09-19· cited 102×
- United States v. Samuel H. SouthSeventh Circuit· 1994-06-29· cited 88×
- United States v. HughesD.C. Circuit· 2008-01-25· cited 77×
- Purdham v. Fairfax County Public SchoolsE.D. Virginia· 2009-06-22· cited 59×
- Cohen v. Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.S.D. New York· 2010-01-07· cited 57×
- Parker v. Rowland Express, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2007-06-25· cited 57×
- Flores v. Anjost Corp.S.D. New York· 2012-06-19· cited 53×
- Ventura v. Bebo Foods, Inc.District of Columbia· 2010-12-03· cited 45×
- Sheffield v. Orius Corp.D. Oregon· 2002-11-08· cited 45×
- Delaney v. Geisha NYC, LLCS.D. New York· 2009-09-22· cited 44×
- Ayres v. 127 Restaurant Corp.S.D. New York· 1998-06-16· cited 43×
- Hunter v. Sprint Corp.District of Columbia· 2004-11-16· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.