Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 1/31/2018

Stephens v. Farmers Rest. Grp.

Citations

  • 291 F. Supp. 3d 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conditional certification “would be unfair to Defendants, who have had no opportunity to test the sufficiency of these new allegations at the pleading stage’
  • stating that \defendants cannot defeat conditional certification by pointing to immaterial variations in how the improper policies alleged by the plaintiff were applied\
  • observing that courts are not required to address arguments \raised only cursorily in a footnote\ (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)
  • observing that \pure speculation\ is not sufficient to establish a common policy or practice
  • applying the three-year period in the conditional certification stage as Defendants failed to argue Plaintiff’s allegations were “implausible.”
  • limiting class to employees who worked at restaurants in D.C. and Maryland when the plaintiffs failed to present evidence of a similar policy at Virginia locations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.