Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs “must sufficiently allege 40 hours of work in a given workweek as well as some uncompensated time in excess of the 40 hours.”
• holding that claims for overtime gap time are not cognizable under the FLSA
• recognizing that, in order to state a plausible FLSA claim, a plaintiff must “sufficiently allege 40 hours of work in a given workweek as well as some uncompensated time in excess of the 40 hours”
• explaining that the Second Circuit “ha[s] upheld.the exercise of.supplemental jurisdiction in situations when as here the ‘state law claims are analytically identical’ to the federal claims”
• noting that the supplemental jurisdiction analysis will usually “point toward a declination[]” once federal claims have been dismissed
• explaining that the Second Circuit does not recognize a claim for gap-time under the FLSA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).