Ayres v. 127 Restaurant Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendants liable for liquidated damages because they intentionally, or at least recklessly, permitted a salaried employee to share in the wait staffs gratuities
• denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment because although most items could be “worn as part of an employee’s ordinary wardrobe,” employees who forget items were not permitted to work and dry-cleaning costs were imposed
• denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment because although most items could be “worn as part of an employee’s ordinary wardrobe,” employees who forget items were not permitted to work and dry-cleaning costs were imposed
• denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment because although most items could be “worn as part of an employee’s ordinary wardrobe,” employees who forget items were not permitted to work and dry-cleaning costs were imposed
• denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment because although most items could be “worn as part of an employee’s ordinary wardrobe,” employees who forget items were not permitted to work and dry-cleaning costs were imposed
• denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment because although most items could be “worn as part of an employee’s ordinary wardrobe,” employees who forget items were not permitted to work and dry-cleaning costs were imposed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).