Skip to main content
· 6/22/2009

Purdham v. Fairfax County Public Schools

Citations

  • 629 F. Supp. 2d 544
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52781
  • 2009 WL 1766600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “conditional certification [was] not appropriate based on the probable necessity of individualized FLSA determinations for each putative class member”
  • concluding that “conditional certification [was] not appropriate based on the probable necessity of individualized FLSA determinations for each putative class member”
  • concluding, at the notice stage, that certification would be inappropriate because adjudication of multiple claims would require inefficient, individualized factual inquiries
  • noting that the district court has broad discretion to determine whether “a collective action is the appropriate means for prosecuting an [FLSA] action”
  • recognizing criticisms of Parker and stating that “[i]t does not appear that any courts within the Fourth Circuit have adopted this relatively stringent test”
  • recognizing criticisms of Parker and stating that “[i]t does not appear that any courts within the Fourth Circuit have adopted this relatively stringent test”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James C. Cacheris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.