State v. Yancy
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1549
Syllabus
Application to reopen appeal; App.R. 26; ineffective assistance of counsel; prejudice; res judicata; appellate review; limited to the record; failure to object; tactical decision; trial strategy; prosecutorial misconduct; closing arguments. Appellant's application for reopening is denied. Appellant did not demonstrate that her appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise her proposed assignments of error.
Judges: E.T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 940×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 898×
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-19· cited 753×
- Jeffrey D. Lundgren v. Betty Mitchell, WardenSixth Circuit· 2006-03-13· cited 562×
- State v. BallewOhio Supreme Court· 1996-08-07· cited 386×
- State v. ReedOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 335×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2001-12-19· cited 58×
- State v. ErkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-08· cited 19×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-25· cited 9×
- State v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-21· cited 9×
- Broadview Hts. v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-21· cited 4×
- State v. YancyOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-13· cited 3×
- State v. MunozOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.