Skip to main content

State v. Stevens

Citations

  • 232 N.E.3d 343
  • 2023 Ohio 4683

Syllabus

Osowik. 1) inadvertent failure to preserve potentially useful evidence contained in T.S.'s cell phone not a due process violation 2) no unfairly prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct in closing 3) jury instruction was correct 4) convictions not against the manifest weight 5) no error in failing to merge convictions for rape and sexual battery 6) no error in denying directed verdict 7) no cumulative error.

Judges: Osowik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.