Skip to main content

State v. Munoz

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 242

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B) application for reopening, res judicata, prosecutorial misconduct. The appellant's App.R. 26(B) application for reopening is denied because appellate counsel was not ineffective on appeal. The issues raised in support of the application for reopening, with the exception of the claim of prosecutorial misconduct, are barred from further review by the doctrine of res judicata. In addition, the appellant has failed to demonstrate any prosecutorial misconduct. The appellant has failed to establish that he was prejudiced by appellate counsel on appeal. Application for reopening is denied.

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.