Skip to main content

State v. Wright

Citations

  • 817 A.2d 600
  • 2003 R.I. LEXIS 26
  • 2003 WL 174602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, during the cross-examination of a witness, “[i]nquiries * * * that exceed the scope of the direct examination are objectionable”
  • holding that the defendant had “failed to make an offer of proof and failed to introduce any evidence tending to show that * * * [the alleged third-party perpetrator] could have committed the murder”
  • “[E]vidence of a third person’s potential motive or opportunity to commit the crime must not lead to jury speculation nor improperly open up collateral matters.”
  • “[Evidence of a third person’s potential motive or opportunity to commit the crime must not lead to jury speculation nor improperly open up collateral matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Lederberg, Flanders, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.