Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 9/1/2005

State v. Gomes

Citations

881 A.2d 97
2005 R.I. LEXIS 169
2005 WL 2105365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding harmless error in admission of blood evidence in light of overwhelming and independent inculpatory evidence
where we, likewise, exercised our plenary jurisdiction in view of the important public election issue involving whether a potentially void referendum matter should be enjoined
“There is no question that a defendant is entitled to present a defense that implicates another person.”
\There is no question that a defendant is entitled to present a defense that implicates another person.\
“[A]n issue that has not been raised and articulated previously at trial is not properly preserved for appellate review.”
“[E]xcept when the in limine ruling is clearly definitive, it would at the very least be prudent for counsel to articulate the objection once again in the vital context of the trial itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Goldberg, Flaherty, Suttell, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.