State v. Bergevine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s failure to raise issues during his motion for new trial waived appellate review of those issues
• affirming trial justice’s denial of a defendant’s motion for a new trial where defendant, on appeal, contended that the trial justice failed to acknowledge several “deficits” in one witness’s testimony, but had failed to alert the trial justice
• “[T]he admission of a statement under an exception to the hearsay rule is within the sound discretion of the trial justice and shall not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.”
• “[T]he admission of a statement under an exception to the hearsay rule is within the sound discretion of the trial justice and shall not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.”
• “[T]he admission of a statement under an exception to the hearsay rule is within the sound discretion of the trial justice and shall not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).