Skip to main content

State v. Burgess

Citations

  • 465 A.2d 204
  • 1983 R.I. LEXIS 1095

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that statement declarant made to the fourth person who spoke with her after the incident was not admissible as an excited utterance
  • statement declarant made to the fourth person who spoke with her after the incident not admissible as an excited utterance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.