State v. Patriarca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that setting a forty-five-minute time limit tor the jury to continue deliberating did not prompt guilty verdicts because the jury returned the verdicts before the trial justice set the time limit
• ''[D]eclarations of co-conspirators made after the termination of the conspiracy may be received only against the declarant * * *.”
• the defendant failed to show that the jury cumulated the evidence, inferred criminal disposition, or showed hostility when the jury found the defendant guilt of conspiracy but returned no verdict on the substantive charges
• the defendant failed to show that the jury cumulated the evidence, inferred criminal disposition, or showed hostility when the jury found the defendant guilt of conspiracy but returned no verdict on the substantive charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).