Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/29/2017

State v. Woods

Citations

284 Or. App. 559
393 P.3d 1188
2017 WL 1161021
2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting, without discussion, the defendant’s challenge to the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury that the verdict must be unanimous
evidence of prior uncharged sexual conduct against victim admissible to show sexual predisposition and need not be justified by the doctrine of chances
\even an argument pertaining to due process rights must be properly preserved to be considered on appeal\
where prior uncharged sexual conduct is offered to show defendant’s sexual propensity for the victim, any error in the trial court’s failure to conduct OEC 403 balancing will not be considered on appeal if defendant has not raised an OEC 403 or due process argument to the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrett, Lagesen, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.