State v. Hagner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there could be prejudicial Austin error only if “Court determines that denial of the § 1310 [dependency and indemnity compensation] claim was properly reopened by the Board”
• noting that the Court “is not a court of equity and cannot provide equitable relief’
• providing that “this Court is not a court of equity and cannot provide equitable relief’ (citing Harvey v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 416, 425 (1994))
• “Court is not a court of equity and cannot provide equitable relief’ (citing Harvey v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 416, 425 (1994))
• no prejudicial error under § 3.103(c)(2) where hearing officer failed to suggest submitting medical evidence which was too speculative to constitute nexus evidence
• \[T]his Court is not a court of equity and cannot provide equitable relief.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).