Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/12/2001
State v. Woodruff
Citations
- 544 S.E.2d 290
- 344 S.C. 537
- 2001 S.C. App. LEXIS 106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if the officer's suspicions are confirmed or are further aroused, the stop may be prolonged and the scope enlarged as required by the circumstances
- \A police officer may stop and briefly detain and question a person for investigative purposes . . . when the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts . . . that the person is involved in criminal activity.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Hearn, Stilwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PichardoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-10-31· cited 61×
- State v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-02-24· cited 36×
- State v. CorleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-05-14· cited 19×
- State v. ProvetCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-01-31· cited 13×
- State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-07-18· cited 11×
- State v. CorleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-04-04· cited 10×
- State v. TindallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-05· cited 8×
- State v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-03-25· cited 8×
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-03-13· cited 6×
- State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-08-20· cited 6×
- State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-17· cited 4×
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-07-17· cited 4×
- State v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-09-07· cited 1×
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-01-27
- State v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-08-07
- State v. Justin T. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2025-12-03
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.