Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/31/2011

State v. Provet

Citations

706 S.E.2d 513
391 S.C. 494
2011 S.C. App. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding \the Fourth Amendment does not per se prohibit questions unrelated to the purpose of the traffic stop unless the unrelated questions unreasonably extend the traffic stop's duration\
stating detention beyond an initial stop is permissible when the detention has become a consensual encounter
\Lengthening the detention for further questioning beyond that related to the initial stop is acceptable [when] the officer has an objectively reasonable and articulable suspicion illegal activity has occurred or is occurring . . . .\
\Warrantless searches and seizures are reasonable within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when conducted under the authority of voluntary consent.\
“In determining whether reasonable suspicion exists, the [circuit] court must consider the totality of the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Huff, Short

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.