Idaho Supreme Court· 3/26/1992

State v. Winn

Citations

828 P.2d 879
121 Idaho 850
1992 Ida. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “the absence of an insanity defense ... does not violate any constitutional protections”
noting that \the absence of an insanity defense ... does not violate any constitutional protections\
abolition of M'Naghten insanity defense does not violate due process or result in the imposition of eruel and unusual punishment
“It is well established that the absence of an insanity defense ... does not violate any constitutional protections.”
“The fact that the photographs depict the actual body of the victim and the wounds inflicted on the victim and may tend to excite the emotions of the jury is not a basis for excluding them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyle, Bistline, Bakes, Johnson, McDevitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.