Idaho Supreme Court· 10/24/1985
State v. Beam
Citations
- 710 P.2d 526
- 109 Idaho 616
- 1985 Ida. LEXIS 545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- list of jurisdictions holding that use of dual jury is not per se prejudicial
- finding implicit authority from court rule providing motion for severance
- decision to use dual juries should be carefully made
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bistline, Donaldson, Bakes, Huntley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-02-14· cited 272×
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 205×
- State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-01-15· cited 162×
- State v. EnnoIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-01-09· cited 156×
- State v. CardIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-12-31· cited 148×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-06-09· cited 146×
- State v. WindsorIdaho Supreme Court· 1985-12-19· cited 131×
- State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 1989-07-10· cited 131×
- State v. ScrogginsIdaho Supreme Court· 1986-04-29· cited 113×
- State v. BeamIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 98×
- Albert Ray Beam v. David Paskett, Warden, Idaho State Prison-BoiseNinth Circuit· 1993-12-07· cited 84×
- State v. RhoadesIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-09-12· cited 80×
- State v. FetterlyIdaho Supreme Court· 1985-10-28· cited 78×
- State v. PrattIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-07-27· cited 78×
- State v. HerreraUtah Supreme Court· 1995-04-21· cited 69×
- State v. PazIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-09-25· cited 65×
- Hedlund v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court· 1992-10-08· cited 65×
- State v. SearcyIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-09-05· cited 64×
- State v. HoffmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-01-29· cited 60×
- State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-07-29· cited 52×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 1,061×
- People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-11-12· cited 665×
- State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 202×
- State v. CreechIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 170×
- State v. OsbornIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 167×
- Commonwealth v. McKennaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-26· cited 167×
- State v. CaudillIdaho Supreme Court· 1985-03-15· cited 156×
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1967-03-27· cited 126×
- State v. SivakIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-08-15· cited 124×
- State v. AragonIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-11-26· cited 117×
- Dobbert v. StricklandSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 109×
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-11-18· cited 106×
- Kinnett Dairies, Inc. v. Dairymen, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-02-21· cited 101×
- State v. LambrightArizona Supreme Court· 1983-09-28· cited 96×
- State v. WhiteIdaho Supreme Court· 1976-07-07· cited 91×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.