Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 7/26/1996

State v. MacE

Citations

  • 921 P.2d 1372
  • 295 Utah Adv. Rep. 44
  • 1996 Utah LEXIS 62
  • 1996 WL 425736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • asserting that “[o]ur use of the term ‘disproportional’ . . . is not meant to express any view on the status of this evolving jurisprudence, nor is the meaning of the term at issue in the present case”
  • asserting that ―[o]ur use of the term ‗disproportional‘ . . . is not meant to express any view on the status of this evolving jurisprudence, nor is the meaning of the term at issue in the present case‖
  • “Mace has not separately briefed his state constitutional claim, and we do not reach it.”
  • ―Mace has not separately briefed his state constitutional claim, and we do not reach it.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Durham, Howe, Russon, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.