Skip to main content

State v. Cannady

Citations

  • 44 P.3d 1122
  • 137 Idaho 67
  • 2002 Ida. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that objection to annotations and references to past crimes of defendant in a book on Rule 404(b) grounds was not preserved where below the book in general was objected to as irrelevant, with no mention of any specific content or annotations
  • reiterating that this court would apply de novo review to relevancy determinations
  • reiterating that this court would apply de novo review to relevancy determinations
  • an objection to the admission of a book did not preserve a separate objection to the defendant’s handwritten notations in the margins

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Trout, Schroeder, Walters, Kidwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.