· 6/29/1993
Brown v. Hamid
Citations
- 856 S.W.2d 51
- 1993 Mo. LEXIS 74
- 1993 WL 229368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Holding that \cases should be heard on the merits if possible\
- noting that Missouri has recognized a spoliation inference for over a century
- noting that Missouri has recognized a spoliation inference for over a century
- evidence is relevant if “an offered fact tends to prove or disprove a fact in issue or corroborates other relevant evidence”
- spoliation “without a satisfactory explanation gives rise to an inference unfavorable to the spoliator”
- defining the test for logical relevancy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benton, Robertson, Holstein, Thomas, Price, Limbaugh, Smith, Covington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.