Skip to main content
· 6/29/1993

Brown v. Hamid

Citations

  • 856 S.W.2d 51
  • 1993 Mo. LEXIS 74
  • 1993 WL 229368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Holding that \cases should be heard on the merits if possible\
  • noting that Missouri has recognized a spoliation inference for over a century
  • noting that Missouri has recognized a spoliation inference for over a century
  • evidence is relevant if “an offered fact tends to prove or disprove a fact in issue or corroborates other relevant evidence”
  • spoliation “without a satisfactory explanation gives rise to an inference unfavorable to the spoliator”
  • defining the test for logical relevancy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Robertson, Holstein, Thomas, Price, Limbaugh, Smith, Covington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.