Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 220 Conn. 385
  • 599 A.2d 1053
  • 1991 Conn. LEXIS 484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s claim that trial court’s remarles to jury concerning defendant’s interest in outcome of case were improper
  • language in amended information charging “he or another participant in said crime” sufficient to alert defendant to possibility that state would proceed on alternate theories
  • \[i]t is axiomatic that the state's burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt applies to each and every element comprising the offense charged\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “[i]t is axiomatic that the state’s burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt applies to each and every element comprising the offense charged” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Covello

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.