Ohio Supreme Court· 9/14/1988

State v. Williams

Citations

38 Ohio St. 3d 346
528 N.E.2d 910
1988 Ohio LEXIS 300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the admission of a hearsay statement was harmless because the “contents of the statement were largely cumulative of the testimony of other witnesses at . . . trial”
holding harmless error in admitting defendant’s prior conviction, in light of remaining properly introduced evidence of defendant’s guilt
holding that a criminal defendant’s successful motion to waive a special venire -13- “was the action made by the accused which necessitated the period of delay, during which the state sought a writ of mandamus reversing the trial court’s decision granting that motion”
finding “[a] statement is not hearsay if it is admitted to prove that the declarant made it, rather than to prove the truth of its contents”
finding “[a] statement is not hearsay if it is admitted to prove that the declarant made it, rather than to prove the truth of its contents”
finding the admission of hearsay that was cumulative to other admitted 1 We note that Brown’s brief arguments relating to the Confrontation Clause are inapplicable because E.M. testified at trial. State v. Keenan, 81 Ohio St.3d 133, 142, 689 N.E.2d 929 (1998

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.