Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 5/26/1993

State v. Taylor

Citations

  • 66 Ohio St. 3d 295
  • 612 N.E.2d 316
  • 1993 Ohio LEXIS 987

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “upset” insufficient where declarant made statements several hours after allegedly startling event
  • “‘[T]here is no per se amount of time after which a statement can no longer be considered to be an excited utterance’ as long as the declarant is still under the stress of the startling event when he makes the statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Eleventh, Mahoney, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

164 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.