Ohio Supreme Court· 9/6/1995

State v. Allen

Citations

73 Ohio St. 3d 626
653 N.E.2d 675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that, although the Court expressed a preference that a certain instruction be avoided, giving the instruction did not constitute prejudicial error
stating that even if the use of a single photo for identification purposes is suggestive, reliable identification testimony may be admitted regardless of the flaws in the procedure
stating that even if the use of a single photo for identification purposes is suggestive, reliable identification testimony may be admitted regardless of the flaws in the procedure
Overruling prosecutorial misconduct claim where the prosecutor asked questions “concerning [the defendant’s] prior not guilty by reason of insanity pleas” where the defendant objected and the objection was sustained.
trial court did not abuse discretion in refusing to appoint neurologist based on Bender-Gestalt test that showed little likelihood of brain damage
trial court did not abuse discretion in refusing to appoint neurologist based on Bender-Gestalt test that showed little likelihood of brain damage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

99 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.