Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2032

Syllabus

Motion to withdraw guilty plea presentence pro se hybrid representation hearing consecutive findings supported clear and convincing no contact prison term felony sentencing. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on defendant's pro se motion to withdraw his guilty pleas without a hearing. The trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences is not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. The trial court erred by imposing a no-contact order when the court had also imposed a prison term.

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.