State v. Williams
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2032
Syllabus
Motion to withdraw guilty plea presentence pro se hybrid representation hearing consecutive findings supported clear and convincing no contact prison term felony sentencing. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on defendant's pro se motion to withdraw his guilty pleas without a hearing. The trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences is not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. The trial court erred by imposing a no-contact order when the court had also imposed a prison term.
Judges: E.T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 1,498×
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-03· cited 128×
- State v. ShelineOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-14· cited 86×
- State v. WestleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-09· cited 29×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-14· cited 7×
- State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.