Cleveland v. McCoy
Citations
- 226 N.E.3d 1024
- 2023 Ohio 3792
Syllabus
Aggravated menacing serious physical harm manifest weight of the evidence closing argument. - Trial court erred in failing to afford defendant an opportunity to present closing arguments when the evidence was against the manifest weight of the evidence to support the defendant's conviction for aggravated menacing.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statutory language should be construed “in light of the purposes Congress sought to serve”
- holding that an impairment corrected by medication or other measures does not substantially limit a major life activity and thus cannot constitute a disability
- holding that courts should take corrective measures into account when deciding whether a plaintiff is “substantially limited in any major life activity” and thus disabled under the ADA
- holding that the EEOC guidelines reflected an impermissible interpretation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and therefore did not warrant judicial deference
- holding that the EEOC guidelines reflected an impermissible interpretation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and therefore did not warrant judicial deference
- holding that the plaintiffs were not substantially limited in any major life activity because plaintiffs severe myopia was correctable with appropriate lenses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.