Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/31/2019

State v. Powell

Citations

2019 Ohio 346

Syllabus

Guilty plea presentence motion to withdraw pro se abuse of discretion. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Powell's pro se presentence motion to withdraw where the record demonstrates Powell was represented by competent counsel, he provided no evidentiary support for claims asserted in the motion, and he failed to rebut the presumption that his plea was knowing and voluntary.

Judges: Sheehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Jones
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-27· cited 6×
State v. Hill
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-02· cited 5×
State v. Williams
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-17· cited 5×
State v. Pames
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-03· cited 3×
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-15· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Xie
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
State v. Thompson
Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 525×
State v. Martin
Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-10-27· cited 279×
Wayne Ernest Barker v. United States of America, United States of America v. Wayne Ernest Barker
Tenth Circuit· 1978-07-12· cited 182×
State v. Washington
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-05· cited 26×
State v. Paulino
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-05· cited 22×
State v. Alexander
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-08· cited 14×
State v. Shaw
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-10· cited 9×
State v. Small
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-12· cited 8×
State v. King
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-29· cited 8×
State v. Barrett
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-27· cited 6×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.