Missouri Court of Appeals· 3/15/2011
State v. Williams
Citations
- 334 S.W.3d 177
- 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 309
- 2011 WL 864943
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying clearly erroneous standard of review to video evidence in suppression hearing because “trial court’s findings of fact are entitled to deference even where they are based on physical or documentary evidence”
- applying clearly erroneous standard of review to video evidence in suppression hearing because “trial court’s findings of fact are entitled to deference even where they are based on physical or documentary evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pfeiffer, Newton, Ahuja
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Terrell Hubbard (073539)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-06-24· cited 353×
- State v. S.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-06-21· cited 343×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-07-22· cited 22×
- Tylicee S. Greene v. Alliance Automotive, Inc. D/B/A JD Byrider and AutoBanc-2 Corporation D/B/A CNACMissouri Court of Appeals· 2014-03-11· cited 19×
- State v. ClampittMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-01-24· cited 19×
- State of Missouri v. Kathryn AventMissouri Court of Appeals· 2014-04-01· cited 11×
- State v. DruryMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-11-29· cited 6×
- State of Missouri v. Tonya Marie ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-07-28· cited 3×
- Mapes v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-11-08· cited 1×
- STATE OF MISSOURI v. DAVID KEVIN HOLMAN, Defendant-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-03-11· cited 1×
- State of Missouri, ex rel, Chris Koster, Attorney General v. Mark BaileyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-05-24· cited 1×
- COLBY DEAN DURST, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals· 2019-09-25
- State of Missouri v. Jesse B. AlfordMissouri Court of Appeals· 2020-07-07
- Antonio M. Morrison v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals· 2021-03-30
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. WILLIAM BRYCE CREUTZ, JR.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2022-12-21
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,950×
- White v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-08-03· cited 363×
- State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri· 1990-07-31· cited 145×
- State v. PikeSupreme Court of Missouri· 2005-04-26· cited 104×
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-08-04· cited 102×
- State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri· 2007-01-09· cited 95×
- United States v. Kenny Eugene SmartEighth Circuit· 2005-02-09· cited 71×
- State v. AbelnMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-05-11· cited 27×
- State v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-09-30· cited 15×
- State v. PeeryMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-02-02· cited 10×
- MSEJ, LLC v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri· 2009-03-31· cited 9×
- State v. SchmutzMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-03-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.