Supreme Court of Missouri· 4/26/2005
State v. Pike
Citations
- 162 S.W.3d 464
- 2005 Mo. LEXIS 105
- 2005 WL 949692
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the same analysis applies to cases brought under Missouri Constitution as under United States Constitution
- noting that reasonable suspicion may be based on erratic or unusual driving
- stating same analysis applies to cases brought under Missouri Constitution as under United States Constitution
- stating same analysis applies to cases brought under Missouri Constitution as under United States Constitution
- stating same analysis applies to cases brought under Missouri Constitution as under United States Constitution
- stating same analysis applies to cases brought under Missouri Constitution as under United States Constitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael A. Wolff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. PrimmSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-08-30· cited 89×
- State v. GraysonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-03-29· cited 67×
- State v. SchroederSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-01-11· cited 46×
- State v. LloydMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-11-27· cited 41×
- State v. NylonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-03-30· cited 36×
- State v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-03-01· cited 34×
- State v. NorfolkSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-06-12· cited 29×
- Dotson v. KanderSupreme Court of Missouri· 2015-06-30· cited 29×
- State v. MorganMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-04-10· cited 28×
- State v. LoveladySupreme Court of Missouri· 2014-05-13· cited 28×
- State v. WoodsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-03-10· cited 27×
- State v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-03-22· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. FahertyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-04-11· cited 25×
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-10-24· cited 23×
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-03-15· cited 20×
- State of Missouri v. Derrick L. CarrawellSupreme Court of Missouri· 2016-01-12· cited 19×
- Shonda Ambers-Phillips and Richard Phillips II v. SSM DePaul Health CenterSupreme Court of Missouri· 2015-04-28· cited 18×
- State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-09-04· cited 18×
- State v. KeethMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-08-30· cited 17×
- State of Missouri v. Sheena MarrMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-09-13· cited 15×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 1,061×
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 832×
- State v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-03-24· cited 291×
- State v. DeckSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-06-01· cited 141×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1975-06-09· cited 127×
- State v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of Missouri· 1990-09-11· cited 110×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-02-21· cited 74×
- Riche v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-02-23· cited 73×
- State v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Missouri· 1981-06-08· cited 64×
- In Re Marriage of KohringSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-08-24· cited 49×
- State v. BarksSupreme Court of Missouri· 2004-03-09· cited 45×
- State v. DamaskSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-12-17· cited 38×
- In Re Marriage of WoodsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-01-14· cited 28×
- United C.O.D. v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2004-12-07· cited 25×
- A.B. v. FrankSupreme Court of Missouri· 1983-09-20· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.